National Do Not Call Registry and List Compliance News
DO NOT CALL STATE & FEDERAL REGULATORY NEWS

This newsletter (or material) is prepared by Copilevitz and Canter, LLC, (816) 472-9000, http://copilevitz-canter.com/, braney@cckc-law.com. Copilevitz and Canter, LLC, does not provide legal services to Do Not Call Compliance or donotcallcompliance.com and does not endorse our website or services. This information is not to be used as a substitute for legal counsel.
 
2022 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2021 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2020 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2019 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2018 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2017 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2016 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2015 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2014 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2013 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2012 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2011 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2010 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2009 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
2008 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2007 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2006 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2005 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2004 Newsletters
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
State Do Not Call
 

March 2020 - Call Compliance News

Federal Communications Commission

On March 20, 2020, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) issued a ruling clarifying the scope of the exemption for calls made for “emergency purposes” in response to the outbreak of COVID-19.  Calls made for “emergency purposes” can legally use an automatic telephone dialing system (“ATDS”) without prior express consent of the called party. In order to qualify, the caller must be from a hospital, or be a health care provider, state or local health official, or other government official, or an organization acting on its behalf and the content of the call must be solely informational, made necessary because of the COVID-19 outbreak, and directly related to the imminent health or safety risk arising out of the COVID-19 outbreak. See https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-20-318A1.pdf.

 

Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals

The Seventh Circuit both affirmed and remanded the trial court’s decision in United States v. DISH Network, LLC. The appeals court affirmed the judgment but remanded the $280 million award noting that the court “based the penalty entirely on DISH’s ability to pay”.

 

California

On March 11, 2020 the California Attorney General issued additional proposed revisions to the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”). The proposed changes include: a change in privacy policy notice requirements; a change in requirements for type of information collected in response to a “right to know request”; record keeping requirement changes; notice of collection to employees; removal of previous guidance regarding sample opt out buttons; the definition of service provider; and the removal of the requirement that privacy controls not be pre-selected.  See https://oag.ca.gov/sites/all/files/agweb/pdfs/privacy/ccpa-text-of-second-set-mod-031120.pdf?.

The authors make every attempt to provide current, accurate information, but Telemarketing ConnectionS® is not intended to be a substitute for legal counsel, and readers should not use it in lieu of obtaining knowledgeable legal, or other professional, counsel expert in the field of commercial telemarketing law. References in Telemarketing ConnectionS® do not constitute endorsement by Copilevitz & Canter, L.L.C. or Telemarketing ConnectionS®. January 1, 2005, Copilevitz & Canter, L.L.C.